Profweb
Profweb is now Eductive. Visit eductive.ca.

Home » Publications » Articles » AddICTive Tools for Evaluation: Monitoring In-Progress Assignments

Publications

Articles

Published January 23, 2017 | Multidisciplinary

AddICTive Tools for Evaluation: Monitoring In-Progress Assignments

Do red pens give you a headache? Does correcting formative tests for acquired knowledge make you dizzy? Are you looking for ways to save time…or trees? Do you want to be more efficient? Are you dreaming of pedagogically-viable strategies and techniques? Are you looking for change?

Evaluation plays a significant role in the teaching profession. Among the various facets of this important responsibility, feedback presents many challenges, and correction is sometimes considered an onerous burden or at least a less-than-inspiring task. Luckily, there is a whole array of digital methods and tools that can become your allies!

In this second part of our series of articles that accompany our In-depth Report on Evaluation and Digital Feedback, we present digital tools for monitoring in-progress assignments.

In-Progress Assignment Monitoring

Objectives

➤ Track the progress of the assignment
➤ Facilitate feedback along the way
➤ Monitor teams more effectively

When students have to complete an assignment or project of a certain scale or over a relatively long period of time, ongoing monitoring is often provided to support them and give them feedback as they advance. This is accomplished more easily when students use technology to produce their work. To complement this section, we encourage you to read the feedback and digital correction tools articles of this series.

You can, of course, ask your students to submit files representing the stages of the assignment they are working on, but this generates an overload of files to manage, not to mention copies of documents that will never be completely up to date. Advances in online tools and the spread of cloud computing gives colleges an extremely easy collaboration environment, for both teamwork and regular communications between teachers and students.

  • Regular monitoring of assignment progress may positively influence intellectual integrity and reduce plagiarism, because the teacher is regularly observing the student’s pace, content and resources.
  • Teachers may also divide assignments up into steps and set interim deadlines and deliverables, to monitor each step and witness the progress of the work accomplished.

Learning and evaluation activities based on reflective practice are excellent ways to provide in-progress monitoring: consider experience logs, laboratory notebooks and ePortfolios. Assignment components such as these lend themselves well to the use of online tools.

Tools to consider

Choose tools that are available online and that allow for collaboration. Not all online tools offer the full array of comment and suggestion functions, but they at least allow you to check the content in real time. You can also check whether specialized tools for your discipline are available online or in the cloud.

In-Progress Assignment Monitoring
Advantages Disadvantages
Allows you to consult the latest version of documents at any time Requires the use of online tools or cloud platforms
Allows you to step in quickly to redirect students Requires the teacher to access the documents of all students for a given assignment
Facilitates frequent feedback May be particularly cumbersome and time-consuming depending on the number of students or teams you are tracking
Encourages more sustained effort from students  
Reduces the risk of plagiarism  
If the tool has a tracking function, you can monitor what different team members contribute  

We invite you to visit our other articles in the AddICTive Tools for Evaluation series:

Click on the link to to return to the landing page for our In-Depth Report on Correction, Feedback and Evaluation: Inspiring Practices and AddICTive Tools.

Are you inspired by these possibilities? Share your discoveries with your colleagues using the Share function! If you are already using technology to support your evaluation tasks, please share your experiences with other Profweb readers in the Comments section below.

About the Author

Andréanne Turgeon She has been working as an Editor for Profweb since 2014. She holds a Bachelor's and Master's Degree in History and has worked on the design and supervision of a distance education course within this domain. Her work as an editor and participation in different college network events allows her to continuously update and enrich her technopedagogical knowledge. She enjoys lending her writing talents to teachers to help them share their innovative practices. She is particularly interested in pedagogical approaches and resources that support student success and inclusiveness.

Resources suggested by the author

0 comment(s)